Timothy E. Burroughs

Associate

Tim Burroughs is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Antitrust and Commercial Litigation groups. Tim’s practice focuses on assisting clients navigate a range of antitrust issues from investigations and litigation to compliance with pre-merger CFIUS and HSR notification requirements. Additionally, Tim has experience representing leading technology, pharmaceutical, and financial services companies in complex commercial disputes throughout the United States.

Tim is a member of the firm’s Antitrust Technology Task Force and a frequent contributor to Proskauer’s Minding Your Business and Proskauer on Price Gouging blogs.

Tim also maintains an active pro bono practice, including representing asylum seekers pursuing claims against the United States for harm suffered in connection with the Trump Administration’s Family Separation Policy.

Tim earned his J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where he was the Executive Student Writing Editor for the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law and interned at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.

Prior to his legal career, Tim was a Teach For America corps member and taught elementary school in the Brownsville neighborhood of Brooklyn.

Subscribe to all posts by Timothy E. Burroughs

On Notice: Procedural Overview of the FTC’s Section 5 Penalty Offense Authority

By Lawrence Weinstein, Jennifer Yang and Timothy E. Burroughs on October 29, 2021 Posted in FTC, Regulatory

As discussed in our earlier post, on October 13, 2021, the FTC issued “Notice of Penalty Offenses” letters to more than 700 companies, placing them on notice of civil penalties up to $43,792 per violation if they use endorsements or testimonials in an unfair or deceptive manner. These letters are the first step for the … Continue Reading

Let it “Bee”: Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Trader Joe’s Manuka Honey Advertising Suit

By Lawrence Weinstein, Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate and Timothy E. Burroughs on August 10, 2021 Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims

A Ninth Circuit panel recently affirmed dismissal of a putative consumer class action alleging Trader Joe’s misleadingly labeled its store brand honey as “100% New Zealand Manuka Honey,” where plaintiffs’ pollen content testing showed that only about 60% of the honey was derived from Manuka flower nectar. In doing so, the Court reinforced the importance … Continue Reading