Proskauer on Advertising Law
Proskauer on Advertising Law

Category Archives: Labeling Claims

Subscribe to Labeling Claims RSS Feed

S.D.N.Y. Waters Down Prior Ruling on “Carbon Neutral” Consumer Deception Claim

By Baldassare Vinti, Jeff Warshafsky and Naomi Caldwell on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
The Southern District of New York recently reconsidered its partial denial of Defendant Danone Waters of America’s motion to dismiss claims alleging Danone falsely advertised Evian water as “carbon neutral.” Reversing his prior ruling, Judge Nelson S. Román concluded that the carbon neutral labeling on Evian water bottle products was not plausibly misleading to reasonable … Continue Reading

What’s in a Word? The Legal Battle over “Natural” in False Advertising

By Baldassare Vinti, Jennifer Yang and Evelyn Blanco on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
While class actions centered around “natural” claims remain popular with the plaintiffs’ bar, this past year has seen some growing skepticism from courts towards such lawsuits, particularly where plaintiffs fail to adequately explain what is deceptive about the term. In January, Judge Kimba M. Wood of the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment … Continue Reading

Reasonable Consumer Analysis Leads to Dismissal of Claims of Greenwashing

By Baldassare Vinti, Jeff Warshafsky and Jessica Griffith on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Many brands have reformulated beloved products with “cleaner” ingredients, while others have curated a special selection of “clean” products to offer their customers.  Advertisers’ efforts, however, can run into trouble if consumers reasonably believe the “clean” labeling does not match what is contained in the product.  Sephora recently faced this issue in a purported class … Continue Reading

Nothing Fishy About Whole Foods’ Fish Oil Supplement Product Label

By Baldassare Vinti, Jessica Griffith and Marielle T. LaBerge on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
In line with prior precedent, the Second Circuit recently affirmed that the product label for Whole Foods’ fish oil softgel product did not deceptively misstate the quantity of Omega-3s it contained.  Foster v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., No. 23-285-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 8, 2023).  The Court found that because the front label was merely … Continue Reading

Courts Neutralize Baseless Acid Lawsuits

By Jeff Warshafsky on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Over the last few years, hundreds of lawsuits have been filed, and many more threatened, involving advertising claims that a product has no artificial preservatives or flavors.  In many cases, the plaintiffs allege such advertising claims are false because the products contain citric acid, malic acid, or other organic acids and natural ingredients. Plaintiffs in … Continue Reading

Sweet (But Not Too Sugary) Victory: Court Dismisses Lawsuit Over Sprout Foods Baby Food Labeling

By Baldassare Vinti, Jennifer Yang and Isaiah D. Anderson on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California recently dismissed a putative class action alleging that Sprout Foods’s nutritional claims on its baby and toddler food labels misled consumers into believing that the products provide physical health benefits.  In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that the products are “harmful both nutritionally and developmentally” due to … Continue Reading

“Born in the USA”?: Place of Origin Claims Take Center Stage in False Advertising Suits and FTC Enforcement

By Baldassare Vinti, Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate and Briana Seyarto Flores on Posted in Deceptive Trade Practices, FTC, Labeling Claims
It has been almost forty years since Bruce Springsteen first famously celebrated being “Born in the USA.” From an advertising industry perspective, this song’s lasting popularity is no surprise; as advertisers know, “Made in the USA” is often a selling point for American industries. The FTC knows this too. In late 2021, the FTC finalized … Continue Reading

Sheep’s Clothing: Court Dismisses Lawsuit Over Allbirds’ Carbon Footprint and Animal Welfare Claims

By Baldassare Vinti, Jennifer Yang and Amy Gordon on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Judge Cathy Seibel of the Southern District of New York recently dismissed a putative class action lawsuit challenging various environmental impact and animal welfare claims made by Allbirds in ads for its wool shoes.  In doing so, the court determined that plaintiff’s allegations, which largely consisted of criticisms of the wool industry in general, did … Continue Reading

Advertising Class Action Trends in 2021

By Baldassare Vinti, Jeff Warshafsky, Jennifer Yang and Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
2021 saw well over 500 new class actions in the advertising space. With the number of these cases increasing, it is more important than ever for businesses to stay on top of the latest trends, including the types of products and claims that are being targeted.  Our full report, available here, goes into detail on … Continue Reading

Instant Dismissal: Court Dismisses Instant Oatmeal Case against Whole Foods Market

By Baldassare Vinti, Jeff Warshafsky and Reut N. Samuels on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Judge Rachel Kovner of the Eastern District of New York recently dismissed a putative class action challenging Whole Foods Market’s label claims that its Oats & Flax Instant Oatmeal contains “dehydrated cane juice solids” and is “100 % Whole Grain – 18g or more per serving.” Plaintiffs alleged these labels communicate that the oatmeal is … Continue Reading

Court Cuts Short Challenge to Zicam’s “Clinically Proven to Shorten Colds” Claims

By Baldassare Vinti, Jeff Warshafsky and Jessica Griffith on Posted in Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
In Yamasaki v. Zicam, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-2596 (N.D. Cal. 2021), Plaintiff alleged certain Zicam® cold remedy products were falsely advertised as “clinically proven to shorten colds.”  On this basis, Plaintiff sought to represent a putative class of California consumers for seven different Zicam products.  Zicam, represented by Proskauer, moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint … Continue Reading

“Butter” Luck Next Time: Court Finds California Cannot Preclude Vegan Dairy from Using “Vegan Butter” Labeling

By Lawrence Weinstein, Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate and Alyson Tocicki on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, FDCA, First Amendment, Labeling Claims
Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California recently ruled in favor of Miyoko’s Kitchen in a suit concerning Miyoko’s labeling of its plant-based spread as “vegan butter.” In doing so, Judge Seeborg determined that absent evidence that the “vegan butter” label was false or would mislead consumers, the state of California could not … Continue Reading

The Rise and Fall of “Vanilla” Labeling Challenges

By Lawrence Weinstein, Jeff Warshafsky and Alyson Tocicki on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Beginning in 2020, the advertising world saw an explosion of putative class-actions challenging the use of “vanilla” to describe products where the vanilla flavoring allegedly is not derived exclusively from the vanilla bean plant.  We previously blogged about several such cases. One plaintiff’s attorney alone, Spencer Sheehan, has filed—and continues to file—hundreds of these cases.  … Continue Reading

“Champion” Petfoods: Seventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of False Advertising Suit Against Pet Food Company

By Lawrence Weinstein, Jennifer Yang and Omobolaji Oluwasola on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
We recently blogged about Champion Petfoods’ success in a Minnesota district court case alleging that it misrepresented the quality of its dog food and ingredients. Well, Champion Petfoods came back to defend its title in another case involving nearly identical allegations, this time in the Seventh Circuit. The Seventh Circuit recently affirmed a Wisconsin district … Continue Reading

Let it “Bee”: Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Trader Joe’s Manuka Honey Advertising Suit

By Lawrence Weinstein, Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate and Timothy E. Burroughs on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
A Ninth Circuit panel recently affirmed dismissal of a putative consumer class action alleging Trader Joe’s misleadingly labeled its store brand honey as “100% New Zealand Manuka Honey,” where plaintiffs’ pollen content testing showed that only about 60% of the honey was derived from Manuka flower nectar. In doing so, the Court reinforced the importance … Continue Reading

More Than “Puffery”: Claims Against Canada Goose Survive Motion to Dismiss

By Lawrence Weinstein, Jeff Warshafsky and Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York recently largely denied a motion to dismiss claims that Canada Goose misled consumers by representing that the fur on Canada Goose jackets is ethically and sustainably sourced. In doing so, the court determined plaintiff’s allegations were “thin,” but viewing the complaint in the light most … Continue Reading

The Legal “Pecking Order”: Ninth Circuit Finds Poultry Labeling Claims Preempted

By Lawrence Weinstein, Jennifer Yang and Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims, Primary Jurisdiction/Preemption
In a unanimous precedential decision, a Ninth Circuit panel recently affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action against Trader Joe’s, which alleged that the statement “Up to 5% Retained Water” on Trader Joe’s poultry product labels was misleading. According to Plaintiff, her independent testing showed Trader Joe’s poultry products contained a higher percentage of … Continue Reading

Judge Wipes Out “Wet Ones” False Advertising Suit

By Lawrence Weinstein, Jeff Warshafsky and Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Judge Todd W. Robinson of the Southern District of California recently dismissed a putative class action against Edgewell Personal Care, the makers of Wet Ones antibacterial hand wipes, alleging it misled consumers by representing Wet Ones kill 99.99 percent of germs and are “hypoallergenic” and “gentle.” In dismissing plaintiff’s claims, the court found no reasonable … Continue Reading

Judge Looks “Kind”ly Upon Certifying Class in Snack Bar Advertising Suit

By Lawrence Weinstein, Jennifer Yang and Alyson Tocicki on Posted in Class Actions, Commonality Requirement, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims, Regulatory
In a recent opinion out of the Southern District of New York, Judge William H. Pauley III certified three classes of plaintiffs in New York, California, and Florida who allege that KIND LLC, the manufacturer of KIND Bars, deceptively marketed several products as “all natural” and “non-GMO,” even though they purportedly contain synthetic and genetically … Continue Reading

Ninth Circuit Drowns Out Alkaline Water Suit

By Lawrence Weinstein, Baldassare Vinti, Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate and Jessica Griffith on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action alleging Trader Joe’s misled consumers by representing its Alkaline Water product as “ionized to achieve the perfect balance.”  In rejecting plaintiff’ allegations that the advertising referred to balancing the consumer’s internal pH rather than the balanced pH of the product itself, the Court … Continue Reading

A Dose of Relief: Federal Judge Dismisses Walgreens Infant Acetaminophen Class Action

By Lawrence Weinstein, Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate and Alyson Tocicki on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Judge Edward Davila of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California recently dismissed with prejudice a putative class action alleging Walgreens misled consumers into believing its store-brand Infants’ Pain & Fever Acetaminophen is specially formulated for infants.  In dismissing the suit, the court found the product’s labeling would not be likely to … Continue Reading

Top Dog: Champion Petfoods Wins Dismissal of Dog Food Suit

By Lawrence Weinstein, Jeff Warshafsky and Jessica Griffith on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Minnesota federal district court Judge Patrick J. Schiltz recently dismissed with prejudice an alleged class action claiming that Champion Petfoods misrepresented the quality of its dog food and ingredients by failing to disclose traces of heavy metals and barbiturates. In dismissing the suit, Judge Schiltz found no reasonable consumer was likely to interpret the contested … Continue Reading

Ninth Circuit Claws Back “Krab Mix” Class Action Dismissal

By Lawrence Weinstein, Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate and Alyson Tocicki on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
A split Ninth Circuit panel recently reversed the dismissal of claims against P.F. Chang’s regarding the chain’s use of the term “krab mix” in the ingredients list for certain sushi rolls. Kang v. P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, No. 20-55138 (9th Cir. Feb. 9, 2021). Plaintiff claimed he purchased P.F. Chang’s “krab mix” sushi rolls because … Continue Reading

2020 Advertising Law Year in Review

By Lawrence Weinstein, Baldassare Vinti, Jeff Warshafsky, Jennifer Yang and Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims, Lanham Act, NAD/NARB/CARU/ERSP, Regulatory
While 2020 was an eventful year in the world of advertising law, it feels wrong to begin any type of “year in review” without acknowledging the global events of this year, and the challenges they have brought to every individual in one way or another. In our role, we are often in a position of … Continue Reading
LexBlog

Proskauer and our platform provider LexBlog each use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze traffic. Each of us also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. If you are happy for us to store these cookies on your device please click 'Accept Cookies.' For more information, please see here and here.

OK