Alexander Kaplan
Subscribe to all posts by Alexander Kaplan
Last month, the FDA finalized amendments to the Nutrition Facts labeling rules for packaged foods and dietary supplements to reflect developments in nutrition science, including new scientific information regarding the link between diet and chronic diseases such as obesity and heart disease. Here are the highlights:… Continue Reading
Hungry to prevent more companies from selling allegedly bogus weight loss products, the FTC has settled yet another false advertising suit against various sellers of diet pills, in a case similar to February’s Sale Slash settlement blogged about here. The FTC’s latest diet pill settlement enjoins distributors of the dietary supplement known as Pure Green Coffee … Continue Reading
Readers may recall our coverage in recent months of the challenge by Procter & Gamble (P&G) to an order certifying a multi-state consumer class in a case asserting that P&G falsely advertised its probiotic supplement Align. Last August, a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit affirmed class certification. In October, the Sixth Circuit stayed its … Continue Reading
Last week, an appellate court held that a plaintiff has standing to bring a false association and false advertising claim under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, even though it did not use its mark or sell its competing product in the United States. In Belmora LLC v. Bayer Consumer Care AG, a Fourth Circuit … Continue Reading
A putative class action got burned at the certification stage earlier this month when U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for the Southern District of Florida found that the proposed class failed to satisfy the ascertainability and typicality requirements. Plaintiff Nathan Dapeer sued Neutrogena, claiming that he and similarly situated consumers had been deceived by … Continue Reading
Last month, the Northern District of California held that prominent photographs of fruits and vegetables on Plum Organics’ food packaging were not enough to mislead a reasonable consumer into believing that the pictured produce were the product’s predominant ingredients. A picture on food packaging may speak a thousand words but, according to the court, reasonable … Continue Reading
A recent National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) decision reminds advertisers to adhere to a fundamental principle of product testing: competing products should be tested in accordance with their usage instructions to substantiate comparative claims. The September 8, 2015 decision involved a Clorox advertisement showing side-by-side white t-shirts with large spaghetti stains. One shirt was treated … Continue Reading
A district judge in the Northern District of California pressed pause on a mislabeling suit involving “natural” claims pending the outcome of two Ninth Circuit appeals. Astiana v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., et al., No. 11-cv-06342 (PJH) (N.D. Cal.) is a putative class action in which the consumer plaintiffs alleged that Hain misleadingly labeled … Continue Reading
Larry Weinstein and Alex Kaplan recently presented on cutting-edge topics in advertising law at the Brand Activation Association’s Marketing Law Conference, Walking the Line: Between Innovation and Regulation, one of the industry’s most important marketing and advertising law conferences. The BAA’s 37th annual Conference was held on November 10th and 11th at the Chicago Marriott … Continue Reading
Bayer recently avoided a contempt finding concerning its Phillips’ Colon Health (“PCH”) probiotics advertising. Bayer advertised PCH as “Promot[ing] Overall Digestive Health” and “Help[ing] Defend Against Occasional Constipation, Diarrhea, Gas and Bloating.” The Government contended Bayer violated a 2007 consent decree requiring Bayer to possess “competent and reliable scientific evidence” substantiating such claims. To support … Continue Reading
In a recent application of the Supreme Court’s 2014 Lexmark decision on standing, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held last month that a yarn retailer who alleged it was misled by its supplier into purchasing mislabeled yarn lacked standing to bring a Lanham Act false advertising claim. Knit With v. Knitting Fever, … Continue Reading
For plaintiffs concerned that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ June 19, 2015 decision in Brown v. GNC Corp. signaled the muscling in of a stricter new pleading standard for false advertising class actions nationwide, a recent ruling out of the Central District of California likely acted as a pacifier. On July 14, 2015, U.S. … Continue Reading
Alex Kaplan was one of three panelists speaking at the Knowledge Congress’ webcast “Irreparable Harm and Trademark Law Demystified! A 2015 Perspective LIVE Webcast” This event was scheduled for Thursday, October 1, 2015 @ 12:00pm-2:00pm ET. Complimentary passes were available for the first 30 registrants courtesy of Proskauer at https://gkc.memberclicks.net/index.php?option=com_mc&view=mc&mcid=form_199984. The event synopsis is below: … Continue Reading
A recent Sixth Circuit decision that affirmed certification of a multi-state consumer class action asserting false advertising claims concerning Align – a Proctor & Gamble probiotic product promising digestive health benefits – has left us with an uneasy feeling in the pit of our stomachs. In Rikos v. P&G, the judge writing the opinion of … Continue Reading
Anheuser Busch recently agreed to settle a consumer class action over Beck’s Beer labeling that we previously reported on with regard to the uptick in consumer class actions proceeding past the pleading stage in the Southern District of Florida. Marty et al. v. Anheuser-Busch Cos., 13-cv-23656-JJO (S.D. Fla.). Anheuser-Busch’s decision to settle the Beck’s suit … Continue Reading
Nordstrom Rack has recently found itself at the center of an unwelcome suit over its labeling practices. Nordstrom Rack discloses the savings it offers customers by placing “compare at” labels on its price tags which show two prices: the “compare at” price and a lower, actual sale price. A recent class action filed in the … Continue Reading
Consumer class action defendants in New Jersey state courts may be able to avoid costly discovery following a New Jersey state appeals court’s recent affirmance of a pre-discovery denial of class action certification in Myska v. New Jersey Manufacturers Co. The putative class alleged that the defendants violated New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act by improperly … Continue Reading
Assume the following: plaintiff brings a putative class action under state consumer protection laws alleging that he bought a product based on false claims on its packaging. He seeks monetary and injunctive relief. However, plaintiff vows never to buy the product displaying the allegedly false advertising again or cannot purchase the product so-labeled because the … Continue Reading
Although consumer class actions in California are dime-a-dozen, a recent Northern District of California case involving One A Day vitamins stands out because it demonstrates how federal regulations can preempt certain state law claims regarding the health benefits of dietary supplements. The putative class alleged that three statements made by Bayer on their One A … Continue Reading
The Institute for Perception’s 2015 Advertising Claims Support Course April 13-15, 2015 The Greenbrier Resort White Sulphur Springs, WV Alexander Kaplan is a featured instructor for The Institute for Perception’s Annual Advertising Claims Support course. This is a professional development course for market research managers, product developers, intellectual property lawyers, in-house counsel, sensory and consumer … Continue Reading
The District Court of Maine recently provided a reminder that – even in the post-Lexmark world of Lanham Act false advertising standing – Article III standing requirements can still impose a meaningful barrier on plaintiffs. On March 18, 2015, District of Maine Judge George Z. Singal dismissed Maine Springs, LLC’s complaint against Nestle Waters North … Continue Reading
NEW YORK: American Conference Institute’s 4th Advanced Forum on Resolving & Litigating Advertising Disputes March 12-13, 2015 The Carlton Hotel New York, NY Larry Weinstein is a featured panelist at ACI’s 4th Advanced Forum on Resolving & Litigation Advertising Disputes. Larry has been invited to moderate a federal judges panel on litigating Lanham Act and … Continue Reading
Last month, Judge Lucy H. Koh of the Northern District of California granted summary judgment in favor of Gerber because the plaintiff failed to satisfy the “reasonable consumer standard” in backing up her allegations that Gerber baby food labeling was misleading in violation of California state law. The case illustrates an important threshold to the reasonable … Continue Reading
The Third Circuit has rendered a notable decision with important implications for the use of fine print in advertising. The Court held that small print statements that explicitly define the terms of a more prominent superior performance claim can render that performance claim unambiguous – and thus subject to a literal falsity claim – even if … Continue Reading
FDA New-trition Rules
By Alexander Kaplan and Daniel Werb on Posted in Regulatory
The FTC Trims the Fat Off Even More Companies Selling Weight Loss Products
By Alexander Kaplan, Jennifer Yang and Russell Kostelak on Posted in Deceptive Trade Practices
Stars Fail to Align for P&G, as Supreme Court Rejects Class Certification Appeal
By Lawrence Weinstein, Alexander Kaplan and Sarah Sullivan on Posted in Ascertainable Class, Class Actions, Commonality Requirement, Deceptive Trade Practices, Typicality Requirement
Fourth Circuit Extends Section 43(a) Lanham Act Standing to Companies Not Selling Their Product or Using Their Mark in the U.S.
By Alexander Kaplan and Evelyn Pang on Posted in Lanham Act
SPF 70 Claims Blocked
By Alexander Kaplan and Lee Popkin on Posted in Ascertainable Class, Class Actions, Typicality Requirement
Snack Time: Court Finds Prominent Pictures of Produce on Fruit Snacks Not Deceptive
By Alexander Kaplan and Russell Kostelak on Posted in Class Actions, Labeling Claims
Follow Instructions For Use Carefully: NARB Affirms Clorox Advertisement Is Unsubstantiated
By Alexander Kaplan and Tiffany Woo on Posted in NAD/NARB/CARU/ERSP
Staying Natural: Hain Label Dispute Must Wait for Ninth Circuit Decisions
By Alexander Kaplan and Lee Popkin on Posted in Ascertainable Class, Class Actions, Labeling Claims
BAA’s 37th Marketing Law Conference-Walking the Line: Between Innovation and Regulation
By Lawrence Weinstein and Alexander Kaplan on Posted in Events and Announcements
Punch to the Gut: Government Denied Contempt Ruling in Bayer Probiotic Case
By Alexander Kaplan and Jeff Warshafsky on Posted in Regulatory
A Yarn Spun, But Advertising Not Tailored to a Lanham Act Claim
By Alexander Kaplan, Lawrence Weinstein and Lee Popkin on Posted in Deceptive Trade Practices, Lanham Act, Primary Jurisdiction/Preemption
Ruling Allows Gerber False Advertising Suit to Crawl Onward
By Alexander Kaplan, Jennifer Yang and James Unger on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Irreparable Harm and Trademark Law Demystified! A 2015 Perspective LIVE Webcast
By Alexander Kaplan on Posted in Events and Announcements, Lanham Act
Out of Align-ment: Sixth Circuit Affirms Class Certification in Probiotics Case
By Lawrence Weinstein, Alexander Kaplan and John Browning on Posted in Class Actions, Commonality Requirement, Deceptive Trade Practices, Typicality Requirement
Beer-Maker Puts an End to Brewhaha: Anheuser Busch Agrees to Settle Second of Two Class Action Lawsuits over Beer Origin Disclaimers
By Lawrence Weinstein, Alexander Kaplan and Jennifer L. Jones on Posted in Class Actions, Labeling Claims
Tailoring the Suit: Plaintiffs File Amended Complaint in Nordstrom Rack Price-Tag False Advertising Lawsuit
By Alexander Kaplan and James Unger on Posted in Labeling Claims, Lanham Act
In Consumer Class Actions, Discovery is not Insured
By Lawrence Weinstein, Alexander Kaplan, Jeff Warshafsky and Daniel Werb on Posted in Class Actions, Typicality Requirement
A Court in the Sunshine State Blocks Injunctive Relief against Neutrogena Sunscreen Claims; Meanwhile P&G Cannot Flush Charmin Claims for the Same Relief in New York
By Alexander Kaplan and Benjamin Rattner on Posted in Class Actions, Deceptive Trade Practices, Labeling Claims
Tomorrow is Another One-A-Day: FDA Guidelines Preempt Vitamin Claims, but Consumer Class Still Has Opportunity to Supplement
By Alexander Kaplan and Daniel Werb on Posted in Class Actions, Labeling Claims, Regulatory
Upcoming Event with the Institute for Perception
By Alexander Kaplan on Posted in Events and Announcements
Court’s Maine Message to Plaintiff Suing Poland Spring: You Don’t Have a Leg to Stand on
By Alexander Kaplan and Lee Popkin on Posted in Labeling Claims, Lanham Act
Upcoming Events in New York and DC
By Lawrence Weinstein and Alexander Kaplan on Posted in Events and Announcements
(Baby)Food for Thought: In Alleging Unlawful and Misleading Product Labeling, Plaintiff Needed More Than One Gerber Baby
By Daniel Werb, Lawrence Weinstein and Alexander Kaplan on Posted in Class Actions, Labeling Claims
Third Circuit Irons Out “Powerful” Performance False Advertising Dispute
By Lindsey Olson, John Browning, Lawrence Weinstein and Alexander Kaplan on Posted in Injunctions, Labeling Claims, Lanham Act